Skip to main content

Hypocritical Hypothesis

Well, after taking all the time to talk it up, I feel like a bit of a hypocrite: I haven't played Vanguard much in days. It isn't really that I bored of Vanguard so much as I allowed it to be crowded out by what was, for me, more rewarding game experiences. I may yet return to Vanguard once I bore of my diversions.

Rogue Galaxy has revealed the kinds of features I'd expect from the same development company that made Dark Cloud 2. Excellent artistic direction, solid and reasonably deep game mechanics, a weapon upgrade system, a grid-based building system, an inventory that gets saturated with useful junk, memorable characters, and more. Games like this both make me glad I own a PS2 and resentful there's not enough of these kinds of games on the far more open-ended platform that a PC should be.

The Space Empires V demo (version 1.25) instilled in me cravings for strategy games I didn't know I had. Compared to the lead competitor in the genre (Galactic Civilizations), Space Empires V features in depth ship design, interactive tactical combat, sophisticated diplomacy options, and multiplayer support. Just as I bought Starfury, this indy developer might see me plopping down money in Space Empires V (although hopefully they'll keep up the rapid patching pace).

So it was that the Supreme Commander demo hits me just as I was gaining some appreciation towards strategy games. I've always preferred Total Annihilation over that vastly more successful and charismatic poser, Starcraft, and Supreme Commander takes Total Annihilation into the 22nd century. The retail versions will include a three-faction campaign, but the Total Annihilation fans know that the real fun is to be found in the Skirmish mode.

I can see two big things that set the Total Annihilation/Supreme Commander balance apart from other RTS:
  1. A simple economic focus that allows for massive amounts of units to be constructed, lost, and reconstructed.
  2. Stacked building commands that allow whole bases to be planned to be built ahead of time.
I've only a couple complaints. First, the system requirements are pretty hefty and make me want to rush out and buy expensive hardware I can't afford. Second, there's no multiplayer support in the demo.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Resonant Induction Really Grinds My Gears... In A Good Way

From about 2pm yesterday until 8pm today, I've been dabbling with my latest custom mod mix for Minecraft 1.6.4, which is this time very much Universal Electricity focused.
Aside from the usual GUI enhancers and Somnia, the primary contenders in this mix were:
Calclavia Core - Of course: this is the base of the Universal Electricity system.Resonant Induction - This seems to be largely focused on increasingly more advanced methods of refining ores divided across 4 ages of technological progression.  It also includes some really cool things such as assembly lines.  I'll primarily be talking about just a few blocks out of this mod today.Atomic Science - A mod dedicated to generating more of those lovely universal electricity volts via the power of splitting the atom.  Build your own nuclear reactor!  Deal with nuclear meltdowns!  You maniac!ICBM - A mod dedicated to generating more destruction using those lovely universal electricity volts (and more than a little gunpowder), it cer…

Empyrion Vrs Space Engineers: A Different Kind Of Space Race

In my quest for more compelling virtual worlds, I have been watching Empyrion: Galactic Survival a lot this bizarro weekend, mostly via the Angry Joe Show twitch stream.  What I have concluded from my observations is Empyrion is following in Space Engineers' shadow, but it is nevertheless threatening the elder game due to a greater feature set (the modding scene notwithstanding).

Empyrion is made in Unity, whereas Space Engineers is built on a custom engine.  While this does put Empyrion at a disadvantage when it comes to conceptual flexibility, its developers nevertheless have a substantial advantage when it comes to adding features due to a savings of time spent that would have gone into developing their own engine.  Examples include:
Planets.  Empyrion already has planets and space to explore between them, whereas in Space Engineers planets are in the works but still awhile away (so you just have asteroid fields to scavenge).Enemies.  Space Engineers' survival mode boasts onl…

Greasing The Grind: Adding Lasting Appeal To Virtual World Sandboxes

Game design, being about entertainment, is not as much science as art.  We're coming up with interesting things that the human mind likes to chew on that "taste" good to it.  Different people find different things, "Fun," and a game designer is tasked with coming up with fun, appealing things.  As pertains to virtual world sandboxes, I identified three of them.

Challenge Appeal.

Dwarf Fortress and Fortresscraft Evolved have the same end game appeal preservation mechanic: wealth equals threat.  The more money your Dwarf Fortress is worth, the bigger the baddies who will come for you, including a bunch of snobby useless nobles who do nothing but push dwarves around and eat.  The more energy you make in Fortresscraft Evolved, the more and bigger bugs come to shut down your base.  Rimworld does something a little different based off of which AI Storyteller you choose, but it generally adds time to your wealth accumulation when deciding what kind of threats to throw a…