Skip to main content

Levine Is Trusting You

Two things bothered me about this video.
  1. GTtv's directing of this clip is such a slashed together chain of video clips and developer interviews that reeks of enough clique to turn my stomach.
  2. But, more importantly:
  3. (Designer and Irrational CEO) Ken Levine says, with some hesitation, "I trust gamers, and that's the thing - is that I think that a lot of game developers are like, 'I have to manage every single moment of a gameplay experience.' But I think that gamers want to do- the fact that gamers are a part of that gameplay experience is really important and that's what it's all about: to give the players more choices of what they can do in the world, what he does, and how he does it."

This bothers me because, Levine's right, a lot of developers don't trust gamers. They develop crappy, derivative, simple games because they don't trust gamers to know what to do with anything better. Gamers in general, it is these developers belief and/or experience, are total knobs. Thus, they develop games for knobs.

In developing BioShock, Levine is giving gamers more credit than that. He's developed a game that is an incredible experience and has deep, creative game play mechanics. It seems likely (as I have not yet played this game for myself) that BioShock will be at the level all games should be if they weren't developed for total knobs.

Levine is trusting gamers, but will this trust pay off?

Lets say that, despite all the apparent hype surrounding the game, its sales do not meet expectations. BioShock, if it is considered a failure, pretty much sends the message to Levine that all those other developers were right. That the gaming public, in general, is the total knobs that those developers believe them to be.

The bigger a budget a game uses, the more total knobs you need to support it. Perhaps, in the end, the true gaming connoisseurs - defined as somebody looking for something really neat that they can sink their teeth into as opposed to playing any old crap they can find on the market - might be relegated to small budget niche titles. True works of art, oddly enough, seem to be noticed by the next generation more than the current. It's unfortunate for computer games, then, that the next generation can't run them anymore.


Popular posts from this blog

Resonant Induction Really Grinds My Gears... In A Good Way

From about 2pm yesterday until 8pm today, I've been dabbling with my latest custom mod mix for Minecraft 1.6.4, which is this time very much Universal Electricity focused.
Aside from the usual GUI enhancers and Somnia, the primary contenders in this mix were:
Calclavia Core - Of course: this is the base of the Universal Electricity system.Resonant Induction - This seems to be largely focused on increasingly more advanced methods of refining ores divided across 4 ages of technological progression.  It also includes some really cool things such as assembly lines.  I'll primarily be talking about just a few blocks out of this mod today.Atomic Science - A mod dedicated to generating more of those lovely universal electricity volts via the power of splitting the atom.  Build your own nuclear reactor!  Deal with nuclear meltdowns!  You maniac!ICBM - A mod dedicated to generating more destruction using those lovely universal electricity volts (and more than a little gunpowder), it cer…

Empyrion Vrs Space Engineers: A Different Kind Of Space Race

In my quest for more compelling virtual worlds, I have been watching Empyrion: Galactic Survival a lot this bizarro weekend, mostly via the Angry Joe Show twitch stream.  What I have concluded from my observations is Empyrion is following in Space Engineers' shadow, but it is nevertheless threatening the elder game due to a greater feature set (the modding scene notwithstanding).

Empyrion is made in Unity, whereas Space Engineers is built on a custom engine.  While this does put Empyrion at a disadvantage when it comes to conceptual flexibility, its developers nevertheless have a substantial advantage when it comes to adding features due to a savings of time spent that would have gone into developing their own engine.  Examples include:
Planets.  Empyrion already has planets and space to explore between them, whereas in Space Engineers planets are in the works but still awhile away (so you just have asteroid fields to scavenge).Enemies.  Space Engineers' survival mode boasts onl…

Greasing The Grind: Adding Lasting Appeal To Virtual World Sandboxes

Game design, being about entertainment, is not as much science as art.  We're coming up with interesting things that the human mind likes to chew on that "taste" good to it.  Different people find different things, "Fun," and a game designer is tasked with coming up with fun, appealing things.  As pertains to virtual world sandboxes, I identified three of them.

Challenge Appeal.

Dwarf Fortress and Fortresscraft Evolved have the same end game appeal preservation mechanic: wealth equals threat.  The more money your Dwarf Fortress is worth, the bigger the baddies who will come for you, including a bunch of snobby useless nobles who do nothing but push dwarves around and eat.  The more energy you make in Fortresscraft Evolved, the more and bigger bugs come to shut down your base.  Rimworld does something a little different based off of which AI Storyteller you choose, but it generally adds time to your wealth accumulation when deciding what kind of threats to throw a…