I took four days off to play Fallout 4... and, well, versus Fallout 3 it is basically just an all around increment with a few new features. Turns out that it's basically a sequel. Who knew?
In combat, the gameplay in Fallout 4 feels different because it has been rebalanced to feel more like a good first person shooter. This has reduced the importance of leaning on the V.A.T.S. mode, and it feels like a slippery slope considering the original two games of the series were entirely about turn-based combat. At this rate, I wonder if the fifth game will eliminate V.A.T.S. completely? I, for one, would be sorry to see it go.
I like how power armor is handled differently in Fallout 4.
Instead of just being another kind of armor to stick on your character,
it's treated more like a human-sized vehicle you can customize and tromp around in.
You can't wear them constantly because they consume fusion cells, essentially fuel, when you are using them. In practice, I found ret…
Last week, I had some realizations that the kind of game I really wanted to play was a sandbox, but "sandbox" is not specific enough to describe it: Start with the definition of a virtual environment where the player is allowed greater-than-usual freedom in doing whatever they want. This is, roughly, what "sandboxes" have come to mean among the mainstream; this is how everything from Minecraft to Transport Tycoon can be called sandboxes.Add to that definition that the player should have significant means to creatively express themselves. This somewhat eliminates "virtual world" games derived from Grand Theft Auto 3 from the definition because they are significantly limited versus something like Minecraft.Add further to the definition that there needs to be satisfying in-game ramifications to the changes the player makes. This is where my complaint from Minecraft arises: building a castle is initially quite satisfying, and you've created a safe haven…